A Study of Digital Authoritarianism in The Context of Public Perception and Attitudes: With Special Reference to Delhi
Abstract
This study explores public perceptions and attitudes towards digital authoritarianism across various socio-political contexts through a comprehensive survey-based approach. As digital technologies increasingly become tools for surveillance, censorship, and control, understanding how different populations perceive these practices is crucial. The study examines the concept of digital authoritarianism, where governments leverage digital tools to monitor and suppress dissent, contrasting these practices with the principles of digital democracy. The research aims to uncover how socio-political environments, including cultural, historical, and media influences, shape public attitudes toward digital authoritarianism. By analyzing data from diverse regions, the study identifies patterns and variations in public perceptions, particularly between democratic and authoritarian regimes, as well as developed and developing countries. It also investigates the factors that influence these perceptions, such as personal experiences with digital tools, media exposure, and educational background. The findings reveal significant differences in attitudes, highlighting the impact of socio-political contexts on the acceptance or resistance to digital control measures. Moreover, the study provides insights into the role of public opinion in resisting or enabling authoritarian practices, offering implications for policymakers and civil society organizations advocating for digital rights and freedoms. By situating the discussion within the broader global debates on cybersecurity, privacy, and human rights, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between technology and authoritarianism. The study ultimately aims to inform the development of strategies that protect civil liberties while addressing security concerns in an increasingly digital world. Through its cross-cultural analysis, this research provides a comprehensive overview of public attitudes towards digital authoritarianism, emphasizing the need for policies that balance technological advancement with the preservation of democratic values.





